Impact of Local Biopsy to the Endometrium Prior to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation on Clinical Pregnancy

  • Tell a FriendPrint

In vitro fertilization (IVF) is the only available solution for many couples with various forms of infertility. The embryo implantation step in the IVF procedure is a complex multistage process and represents the majority of the causes of the IVF failure. Several approaches have been evaluated to improve implantation rates but none has demonstrated its superiority. However, endometrial...

Brief Summary

Official Title: “Influence of Local Biopsy of the Endometrium Prior to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for IVF or ICSI Procedure on the Rates of Embryo Implantation, Clinical Pregnancy and Live Birth in ART”

In vitro fertilization (IVF) is the only available solution for many couples with various forms of infertility. The embryo implantation step in the IVF procedure is a complex multistage process and represents the majority of the causes of the IVF failure. Several approaches have been evaluated to improve implantation rates but none has demonstrated its superiority. However, endometrial receptivity is important for pregnancy and several studies suggest that local injury to the endometrium of IVF patients improves the rates of embryo implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth.

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design: Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Study Primary Completion Date: December 2012

Detailed Clinical Trial Description

They are possible mechanisms by which endometrial sampling may increase receptivity and improve clinical pregnancy rate of IVF-ET. First, local injury to proliferative phase endometrium might induce the decidualization of the endometrium, and increase its implantation rate. Second, local injury to the endometrium might provoke the wound healing, involving a mass secretion of different cytokines and growth factor, which are beneficial for embryo implantation. Last, the injury might make the endometrium maturation.

This study proposes to evaluate the efficiency of an endometrial injury in the first controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycle on the rate of clinical pregnancy, in assisted reproductive technologies. This study will compare 2 groups of patients. The first group will undergo biopsy of the endometrium before the IVF; the second will undergo the IVF alone. Inclusions will be conducted on 33 months; the patients will be in the study for a period of 36 weeks. The total duration of the study is 39 months

Intervention(s) in this Clinical Trial

  • Procedure: biopsy
    • The endometrium biopsy will be done as the same time as the GnRH treatment. The biopsy is realised with a Pipette de Cornier® (CDD international, PROMIDED France) following the laboratory protocol: Apply antiseptic solution (povidone-iodine, Dakin®) on the cervix and vagina. In most cases, using Pozzi forceps is not necessary. Insert carefully the pipelle de Cornier® in the uterus through the cervix. Withdraw the piston to create a negative pression Move the pipelle de cornier® in and out while twisting. Take care to no remove the pipelle form the uterus (suction lost). Twist the pipelle de Cornier® to cover an angle of 360°. Make several "in and out" cycle in order to collect a complete sample of the endometrium. Withdraw the pipelle de Cornier® when filled with tissue Reinsert internal piston to deposit sample in cup filled with a fixative.
  • Procedure: IVF
    • fresh IVF-embryo transfer treated with long protocol for the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation

Arms, Groups and Cohorts in this Clinical Trial

  • Experimental: group 1 : IVF with biopsy
    • fresh IVF-embryo transfer treated with long protocol or antagonist protocol for the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation plus local injury to the endometrium of patients one menstrual cycle before the IVF
  • Active Comparator: group 2
    • fresh IVF-embryo transfer treated with long protocol or antagonist protocol for the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation alone

Outcome Measures for this Clinical Trial

Primary Measures

  • Rate of clinical pregnancy
    • Time Frame: 5 weeks after the embryo implantation in an IVF procedure
      Safety Issue?: No

Secondary Measures

  • Rate of clinical pregnancy
    • Time Frame: 3 months after the IVF implantation
      Safety Issue?: No
  • Rate of embryo implantation
    • Time Frame: 5 weeks after the embryo implantation
      Safety Issue?: No
  • Rate of miscarriage/extra-uterine pregnancy/multiple pregnancy
    • Time Frame: first trimester after the IVF
      Safety Issue?: Yes
  • Adverse effects during the local injury (biopsy) to the endometrium
    • Time Frame: during the biopsy
      Safety Issue?: Yes
  • Evaluation of the patients pain intensity and type from the biopsy.
    • Time Frame: during and after the biopsy
      Safety Issue?: Yes

Criteria for Participation in this Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria:

  • primary or secondary infertility
  • first or second IVF attempt
  • aged ≥18 and ≤38 years
  • regular menstrual cycles
  • FSH≤ 12IU/L
  • Informed consent signed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ovocyte donor
  • pathology of the uterus or annexes
  • Body mass index (BMI)> 35
  • ongoing vaginal infection
  • undetermined vaginal bleeding
  • contraindication to the Cornier pipette or to these treatments : Gonal F®, Puregon®, Ovitrelle®, Utrogestan®,
  • women included in another study on medically assisted procreation
  • any administrative or legal supervision

Gender Eligibility for this Clinical Trial: Female

Minimum Age for this Clinical Trial: 18 Years

Maximum Age for this Clinical Trial: 38 Years

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted for this Clinical Trial?: No

Clinical Trial Investigator Information

Lead Investigator: University Hospital, Bordeaux Other

Overall Clinical Trial Officials and Contacts

Antoine Benard, Doctor Study Chair University Hospital Bordeaux, France  

Overall Contact: Sandrine Blancpain, Doctor 05 56 79 58 35 sandrine.blancpain@chu-bordeaux.fr

Related Publications

References

Bourgain C, Devroey P. The endometrium in stimulated cycles for IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 2003 Nov-Dec;9(6):515-22. Review.

Richter KS, Bugge KR, Bromer JG, Levy MJ. Relationship between endometrial thickness and embryo implantation, based on 1,294 cycles of in vitro fertilization with transfer of two blastocyst-stage embryos. Fertil Steril. 2007 Jan;87(1):53-9. Epub 2006 Nov 1.

Barash A, Dekel N, Fieldust S, Segal I, Schechtman E, Granot I. Local injury to the endometrium doubles the incidence of successful pregnancies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2003 Jun;79(6):1317-22.

Raziel A, Schachter M, Strassburger D, Bern O, Ron-El R, Friedler S. Favorable influence of local injury to the endometrium in intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients with high-order implantation failure. Fertil Steril. 2007 Jan;87(1):198-201.

Pritts EA, Atwood AK. Luteal phase support in infertility treatment: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials. Hum Reprod. 2002 Sep;17(9):2287-99. Review.

Revelli A, Dolfin E, Gennarelli G, Lantieri T, Massobrio M, Holte JG, Tur-Kaspa I. Low-dose acetylsalicylic acid plus prednisolone as an adjuvant treatment in IVF: a prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2008 Nov;90(5):1685-91. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

Khairy M, Banerjee K, El-Toukhy T, Coomarasamy A, Khalaf Y. Aspirin in women undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2007 Oct;88(4):822-31. Epub 2007 May 16. Review.

Silver MM, Miles P, Rosa C. Comparison of Novak and Pipelle endometrial biopsy instruments. Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Nov;78(5 Pt 1):828-30.

Gellersen B, Brosens IA, Brosens JJ. Decidualization of the human endometrium: mechanisms, functions, and clinical perspectives. Semin Reprod Med. 2007 Nov;25(6):445-53. Review.

Lindhard A, Ravn V, Bentin-Ley U, Horn T, Bangsboell S, Rex S, Toft B, Soerensen S. Ultrasound characteristics and histological dating of the endometrium in a natural cycle in infertile women compared with fertile controls. Fertil Steril. 2006 Nov;86(5):1344-55. Epub 2006 Sep 14.

Homburg R, Pap H, Brandes M, Huirne J, Hompes P, Lambalk CB. Endometrial biopsy during induction of ovulation with clomiphene citrate in polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2006 Sep;22(9):506-10.

Sulewski JM, Ward SP, McGaffic W. Endometrial biopsy during a cycle of conception. Fertil Steril. 1980 Dec;34(6):548-51.

Wentz AC, Herbert CM 3rd, Maxson WS, Hill GA, Pittaway DE. Cycle of conception endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril. 1986 Aug;46(2):196-9.

Balasch J, Vanrell JA, Márquez M, González-Merlo J. Endometrial biopsy inadvertently taken in the cycle of conception. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1984 Apr;22(2):95-9.

Giorgetti C, Terriou P, Auquier P, Hans E, Spach JL, Salzmann J, Roulier R. Embryo score to predict implantation after in-vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod. 1995 Sep;10(9):2427-31.

Abramov Y, Elchalal U, Schenker JG. Severe OHSS: An 'epidemic' of severe OHSS: a price we have to pay? Hum Reprod. 1999 Sep;14(9):2181-3. Review. No abstract available.

Balasch J, Fábregues F, Arroyo V. Peripheral arterial vasodilation hypothesis: a new insight into the pathogenesis of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Hum Reprod. 1998 Oct;13(1O):2718-30. Review.

Govaerts I, Devreker F, Delbaere A, Revelard P, Englert Y. Short-term medical complications of 1500 oocyte retrievals for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998 Apr;77(2):239-43.

Perrier D'hauterive S, Charlet-Renard C, Goffin F, Foidart M, Geenen V. [The implantation window] J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2002 Sep;31(5):440-55. Review. French.

Bourgain C. [Endometrial biopsy in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity] J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2004 Feb;33(1 Pt 2):S13-7. Review. French.

Zhou L, Li R, Wang R, Huang HX, Zhong K. Local injury to the endometrium in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles improves implantation rates. Fertil Steril. 2008 May;89(5):1166-76. Epub 2007 Aug 6.

Cornier E. The Pipelle: a disposable device for endometrial biopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Jan 1;148(1):109-10. No abstract available.

Check JH, Chase JS, Nowroozi K, Wu CH, Chern R. Clinical evaluation of the Pipelle endometrial suction curette for timed endometrial biopsies. J Reprod Med. 1989 Mar;34(3):218-20.

Henig I, Chan P, Tredway DR, Maw GM, Gullett AJ, Cheatwood M. Evaluation of the Pipelle curette for endometrial biopsy. J Reprod Med. 1989 Oct;34(10):786-9.

Machado F, Moreno J, Carazo M, León J, Fiol G, Serna R. Accuracy of endometrial biopsy with the Cornier pipelle for diagnosis of endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2003;24(3-4):279-81.

Golan A, Ron-el R, Herman A, Soffer Y, Weinraub Z, Caspi E. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: an update review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989 Jun;44(6):430-40. Review. No abstract available.

Additional Information

Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on February 09, 2012

Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01064193

Study ID Number: CHUBX 2009/12

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01064193

Health Authority: France: Afssaps - French Health Products Safety Agency

  • Tell a FriendPrint

Clinical Trials content is provided directly by the U.S. National Institutes of Health via ClinicalTrials.gov and is not reviewed separately by ClinicalTrialsFeeds.org. Every page of specific clinical trials information contains a unique identifier which can be used to find further details directly from the National Institutes of Health.

The URL of this page is:
http://clinicaltrialsfeeds.org/clinical-trials/show/NCT01064193